upcScavenger » Normed Spaces » Wiki: Inner Product Space

Inner product space

( Normed Spaces )

Inner Langle Rangle Space

Rank: 100%

Wiki
Comments
Media

In mathematics, an inner product space (or, rarely, a Hausdorff space pre-Hilbert space) is a real vector space or a complex vector space with an operation called an inner product. The inner product of two vectors in the space is a scalar, often denoted with angle brackets such as in $\langle a, b \rangle$ . Inner products allow formal definitions of intuitive geometric notions, such as lengths, , and orthogonality (zero inner product) of vectors. Inner product spaces generalize Euclidean vector spaces, in which the inner product is the dot product or scalar product of Cartesian coordinates. Inner product spaces of infinite dimension are widely used in functional analysis. Inner product spaces over the field of are sometimes referred to as unitary spaces. The first usage of the concept of a vector space with an inner product is due to Giuseppe Peano, in 1898.

An inner product naturally induces an associated norm, (denoted $|x|$ and $|y|$ in the picture); so, every inner product space is a normed vector space. If this normed space is also complete (that is, a Banach space) then the inner product space is a Hilbert space. If an inner product space is not a Hilbert space, it can be extended by completion to a Hilbert space $\overline{H}.$ This means that $H$ is a linear subspace of $\overline{H},$ the inner product of $H$ is the restriction of that of $\overline{H},$ and $H$ is Dense subset in $\overline{H}$ for the topology defined by the norm.

Definition

In this article, denotes a field that is either the

\R,

or the

\Complex.

A scalar is thus an element of . A bar over an expression representing a scalar denotes the complex conjugate of this scalar. A zero vector is denoted

\mathbf 0

for distinguishing it from the scalar .

An inner product space is a vector space over the field together with an inner product, that is, a map $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle : V \times V \to F$ that satisfies the following three properties for all vectors $x,y,z\in V$ and all scalars

Conjugate symmetry: $\langle x, y \rangle = \overline{\langle y, x \rangle}.$ As $a = \overline{a}$ if and only if $a$ is real, conjugate symmetry implies that $\langle x, x \rangle$ is always a real number. If is $\R$ , conjugate symmetry is just symmetry.
Linear map in the first argument:By combining the linear in the first argument property with the conjugate symmetry property you get conjugate-linear in the second argument: $\langle x,by \rangle = \langle x,y \rangle \overline{b}$ . This is how the inner product was originally defined and is used in most mathematical contexts. A different convention has been adopted in theoretical physics and quantum mechanics, originating in the bra-ket notation of Paul Dirac, where the inner product is taken to be linear in the second argument and conjugate-linear in the first argument; this convention is used in many other domains such as engineering and computer science.

    \langle ax+by, z \rangle = a \langle x, z \rangle + b  \langle y, z \rangle.

Positive-definiteness: if $x$ is not zero, then

     \langle x, x \rangle > 0

(conjugate symmetry implies that

\langle x, x \rangle

is real).

If the positive-definiteness condition is replaced by merely requiring that $\langle x, x \rangle \geq 0$ for all $x$ , then one obtains the definition of positive semi-definite Hermitian form. A positive semi-definite Hermitian form $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$ is an inner product if and only if for all $x$ , if $\langle x, x \rangle = 0$ then $x = \mathbf 0$ .

Basic properties

In the following properties, which result almost immediately from the definition of an inner product, and are arbitrary vectors, and and are arbitrary scalars.

$\langle \mathbf{0}, x \rangle=\langle x,\mathbf{0}\rangle=0.$
$\langle x, x \rangle$ is real and nonnegative.
$\langle x, x \rangle = 0$ if and only if $x=\mathbf{0}.$
$\langle x, ay+bz \rangle= \overline a \langle x, y \rangle + \overline b \langle x, z \rangle.$
This implies that an inner product is a sesquilinear form.
$\langle x + y, x + y \rangle = \langle x, x \rangle + 2\operatorname{Re}(\langle x, y \rangle) + \langle y, y \rangle,$ where $\operatorname{Re}$
denotes the real part of its argument.

Over $\R$ , conjugate-symmetry reduces to symmetry, and sesquilinearity reduces to bilinearity. Hence an inner product on a real vector space is a positive-definite symmetric bilinear form. The binomial expansion of a square becomes $\langle x + y, x + y \rangle = \langle x, x \rangle + 2\langle x, y \rangle + \langle y, y \rangle .$

Notation

Several notations are used for inner products, including

\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle

\left ( \cdot, \cdot \right )

\langle \cdot | \cdot \rangle

and

\left ( \cdot | \cdot \right )

, as well as the usual dot product.

Convention variant

Some authors, especially in physics and matrix algebra, prefer to define inner products and sesquilinear forms with linearity in the second argument rather than the first. Then the first argument becomes conjugate linear, rather than the second. Bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics also uses slightly different notation, i.e.

\langle \cdot | \cdot \rangle

, where

\langle x | y \rangle := \left ( y, x \right )

Examples

Real and complex numbers

Among the simplest examples of inner product spaces are

\R

and

\Complex.

The

\R

are a vector space over

\R

that becomes an inner product space with arithmetic multiplication as its inner product:

\langle x, y \rangle := x y \quad \text{ for } x, y \in \R.

The $\Complex$ are a vector space over $\Complex$ that becomes an inner product space with the inner product $\langle x, y \rangle := x \overline{y} \quad \text{ for } x, y \in \Complex.$ Unlike with the real numbers, the assignment $(x, y) \mapsto x y$ does define a complex inner product on $\Complex.$

Euclidean vector space

More generally, the real

n

-space

\R^n

with the dot product is an inner product space, an example of a Euclidean vector space.

\left\langle

 \begin{bmatrix} x_1 \\ \vdots \\ x_n \end{bmatrix},
 \begin{bmatrix} y_1 \\ \vdots \\ y_n \end{bmatrix}

\right\rangle = x^\textsf{T} y = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i = x_1 y_1 + \cdots + x_n y_n, where

x^{\operatorname{T}}

is the transpose of

x.

A function $\langle \,\cdot, \cdot\, \rangle : \R^n \times \R^n \to \R$ is an inner product on $\R^n$ if and only if there exists a Symmetric matrix positive-definite matrix $\mathbf{M}$ such that $\langle x, y \rangle = x^{\operatorname{T}} \mathbf{M} y$ for all $x, y \in \R^n.$ If $\mathbf{M}$ is the identity matrix then $\langle x, y \rangle = x^{\operatorname{T}} \mathbf{M} y$ is the dot product. For another example, if $n = 2$ and $\mathbf{M} = \begin{bmatrix} a & b \\ b & d \end{bmatrix}$ is positive-definite (which happens if and only if $\det \mathbf{M} = a d - b^2 > 0$ and one/both diagonal elements are positive) then for any $x := \leftx_1,^{\operatorname{T}}, y := \lefty_1,^{\operatorname{T}} \in \R^2,$ $\langle x, y \rangle$

= x^{\operatorname{T}} \mathbf{M} y

= \leftx_1, \begin{bmatrix} a & b \\ b & d \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} y_1 \\ y_2 \end{bmatrix} = a x_1 y_1 + b x_1 y_2 + b x_2 y_1 + d x_2 y_2. As mentioned earlier, every inner product on

\R^2

is of this form (where

b \in \R, a > 0

and

d > 0

satisfy

a d > b^2

Complex coordinate space

The general form of an inner product on

\Complex^n

is known as the Hermitian form and is given by

\langle x, y \rangle = y^\dagger \mathbf{M} x = \overline{x^\dagger \mathbf{M} y},

where

M

is any Hermitian matrix positive-definite matrix and

y^{\dagger}

is the conjugate transpose of

y.

For the real case, this corresponds to the dot product of the results of directionally-different scaling of the two vectors, with positive and orthogonal directions of scaling. It is a Weight function version of the dot product with positive weights—up to an orthogonal transformation.

Hilbert space

The article on Hilbert spaces has several examples of inner product spaces, wherein the metric induced by the inner product yields a complete metric space. An example of an inner product space which induces an incomplete metric is the space

C(a,)

of continuous complex valued functions

f

and

g

on the interval

a,.

The inner product is

\langle f, g \rangle = \int_a^b f(t) \overline{g(t)} \, \mathrm{d}t.

This space is not complete; consider for example, for the interval the sequence of continuous "step" functions,

\{ f_k \}_k,

defined by:

f_k(t) = \begin{cases} 0 & t \in -1, \\ 1 & t \in \left\tfrac{1}{k}, \\ kt & t \in \left(0, \tfrac{1}{k}\right) \end{cases}

This sequence is a Cauchy sequence for the norm induced by the preceding inner product, which does not converge to a function.

Random variables

For real

X

and

Y,

the expected value of their product

\langle X, Y \rangle = \mathbb{E}XY

is an inner product. In this case,

\langle X, X \rangle = 0

if and only if

\mathbb{P}X = 1

(that is,

X = 0

almost surely), where

\mathbb{P}

denotes the probability of the event. This definition of expectation as inner product can be extended to as well.

Complex matrices

The inner product for complex square matrices of the same size is the Frobenius inner product

\langle A, B \rangle := \operatorname{tr}\left(AB^\dagger\right)

. Since trace and transposition are linear and the conjugation is on the second matrix, it is a sesquilinear operator. We further get Hermitian symmetry by,

\langle A, B \rangle = \operatorname{tr}\left(AB^\dagger\right) = \overline{\operatorname{tr}\left(BA^\dagger\right)} = \overline{\left\langle B,A \right\rangle}

Finally, since for

A

nonzero,

\langle A, A\rangle = \sum_{ij} \left|A_{ij}\right|^2 > 0

, we get that the Frobenius inner product is positive definite too, and so is an inner product.

Vector spaces with forms

On an inner product space, or more generally a vector space with a nondegenerate form (hence an isomorphism

V \to V^*

), vectors can be sent to covectors (in coordinates, via transpose), so that one can take the inner product and outer product of two vectors—not simply of a vector and a covector.

Basic results, terminology, and definitions

Norm properties

Every inner product space induces a norm, called its , that is defined by

\|x\| = \sqrt{\langle x, x \rangle}.

With this norm, every inner product space becomes a normed vector space.

So, every general property of normed vector spaces applies to inner product spaces. In particular, one has the following properties:

Orthogonality

{\|y\|^2} minimizes

f

with value

f\left(s_0\right) = - \tfrac

which is always non positive).
>

For a inner product space $H,$ a linear operator $T : V \to V$ is identically $0$ if and only if $x \perp T x$ for every $x \in V.$ This is not true in general for real inner product spaces, as it is a consequence of conjugate symmetry being distinct from symmetry for complex inner products. A counterexample in a real inner product space is $T$ a 90° rotation in $\mathbb{R}^2$ , which maps every vector to an orthogonal vector but is not identically $0$ .

Real and complex parts of inner products

Suppose that

\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle

is an inner product on

V

(so it is antilinear in its second argument). The polarization identity shows that the real part of the inner product is

\operatorname{Re} \langle x, y \rangle = \frac{1}{4} \left(\

^2\right).

If $V$ is a real vector space then $\langle x, y \rangle
= \operatorname{Re} \langle x, y \rangle
= \frac{1}{4} \left(\$

^2\right) and the imaginary part (also called the ) of

\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle

is always

0.

Assume for the rest of this section that $V$ is a complex vector space. The polarization identity for complex vector spaces shows that $\begin{alignat}{4}
\langle x, \ y \rangle
&= \frac{1}{4} \left(\$

^2 \right) \\ &= \operatorname{Re} \langle x, y \rangle + i \operatorname{Re} \langle x, i y \rangle. \\ \end{alignat}

The map defined by $\langle x \mid y \rangle = \langle y, x \rangle$ for all $x, y \in V$ satisfies the axioms of the inner product except that it is antilinear in its , rather than its second, argument. The real part of both $\langle x \mid y \rangle$ and $\langle x, y \rangle$ are equal to $\operatorname{Re} \langle x, y \rangle$ but the inner products differ in their complex part: $\begin{alignat}{4}
\langle x \mid y \rangle
&= \frac{1}{4} \left(\$

^2 \right) \\ &= \operatorname{Re} \langle x, y \rangle - i \operatorname{Re} \langle x, i y \rangle. \\ \end{alignat}

The last equality is similar to the formula expressing a linear functional in terms of its real part.

These formulas show that every complex inner product is completely determined by its real part. Moreover, this real part defines an inner product on $V,$ considered as a real vector space. There is thus a one-to-one correspondence between complex inner products on a complex vector space $V,$ and real inner products on $V.$

For example, suppose that $V = \Complex^n$ for some integer $n > 0.$ When $V$ is considered as a real vector space in the usual way (meaning that it is identified with the $2 n-$ dimensional real vector space $\R^{2n},$ with each $\left(a_1 + i b_1, \ldots, a_n + i b_n\right) \in \Complex^n$ identified with $\left(a_1, b_1, \ldots, a_n, b_n\right) \in \R^{2n}$ ), then the dot product $x \,\cdot\, y = \left(x_1, \ldots, x_{2n}\right) \, \cdot \, \left(y_1, \ldots, y_{2n}\right) := x_1 y_1 + \cdots + x_{2n} y_{2n}$ defines a real inner product on this space. The unique complex inner product $\langle \,\cdot, \cdot\, \rangle$ on $V = \C^n$ induced by the dot product is the map that sends $c = \left(c_1, \ldots, c_n\right), d = \left(d_1, \ldots, d_n\right) \in \Complex^n$ to $\langle c, d \rangle := c_1 \overline{d_1} + \cdots + c_n \overline{d_n}$ (because the real part of this map $\langle \,\cdot, \cdot\, \rangle$ is equal to the dot product).

Real vs. complex inner products

Let

V_{\R}

denote

V

considered as a vector space over the real numbers rather than complex numbers. The real part of the complex inner product

\langle x, y \rangle

is the map

\langle x, y \rangle_{\R} = \operatorname{Re} \langle x, y \rangle ~:~ V_{\R} \times V_{\R} \to \R,

which necessarily forms a real inner product on the real vector space

V_{\R}.

Every inner product on a real vector space is a Bilinear map and symmetric map.

For example, if $V = \Complex$ with inner product $\langle x, y \rangle = x \overline{y},$ where $V$ is a vector space over the field $\Complex,$ then $V_{\R} = \R^2$ is a vector space over $\R$ and $\langle x, y \rangle_{\R}$ is the dot product $x \cdot y,$ where $x = a + i b \in V = \Complex$ is identified with the point $(a, b) \in V_{\R} = \R^2$ (and similarly for $y$ ); thus the standard inner product $\langle x, y \rangle = x \overline{y},$ on $\Complex$ is an "extension" the dot product . Also, had $\langle x, y \rangle$ been instead defined to be the $\langle x, y \rangle = x y$ (rather than the usual $\langle x, y \rangle = x \overline{y}$ ) then its real part $\langle x, y \rangle_{\R}$ would be the dot product; furthermore, without the complex conjugate, if $x \in \C$ but $x \not\in \R$ then $\langle x, x \rangle = x x = x^2 \not\in [0, \infty)$ so the assignment $x \mapsto \sqrt{\langle x, x \rangle}$ would not define a norm.

The next examples show that although real and complex inner products have many properties and results in common, they are not entirely interchangeable. For instance, if $\langle x, y \rangle = 0$ then $\langle x, y \rangle_{\R} = 0,$ but the next example shows that the converse is in general true. Given any $x \in V,$ the vector $i x$ (which is the vector $x$ rotated by 90°) belongs to $V$ and so also belongs to $V_{\R}$ (although scalar multiplication of $x$ by $i = \sqrt{-1}$ is not defined in $V_{\R},$ the vector in $V$ denoted by $i x$ is nevertheless still also an element of $V_{\R}$ ). For the complex inner product, $\langle x, ix \rangle = -i \$

^2, whereas for the real inner product the value is always

\langle x, ix \rangle_{\R} = 0.

If $\langle \,\cdot, \cdot\, \rangle$ is a complex inner product and $A : V \to V$ is a continuous linear operator that satisfies $\langle x, A x \rangle = 0$ for all $x \in V,$ then $A = 0.$ This statement is no longer true if $\langle \,\cdot, \cdot\, \rangle$ is instead a real inner product, as this next example shows. Suppose that $V = \Complex$ has the inner product $\langle x, y \rangle := x \overline{y}$ mentioned above. Then the map $A : V \to V$ defined by $A x = ix$ is a linear map (linear for both $V$ and $V_{\R}$ ) that denotes rotation by $90^{\circ}$ in the plane. Because $x$ and $A x$ are perpendicular vectors and $\langle x, Ax \rangle_{\R}$ is just the dot product, $\langle x, Ax \rangle_{\R} = 0$ for all vectors $x;$ nevertheless, this rotation map $A$ is certainly not identically $0.$ In contrast, using the complex inner product gives $\langle x, Ax \rangle = -i \$

^2, which (as expected) is not identically zero.

Orthonormal sequences

Let

V

be a finite dimensional inner product space of dimension

n.

Recall that every basis of

V

consists of exactly

n

linearly independent vectors. Using the Gram–Schmidt process we may start with an arbitrary basis and transform it into an orthonormal basis. That is, into a basis in which all the elements are orthogonal and have unit norm. In symbols, a basis

\{e_1, \ldots, e_n\}

is orthonormal if

\langle e_i, e_j \rangle = 0

for every

i \neq j

and

\langle e_i, e_i \rangle = \

^2 = 1 for each index

i.

This definition of orthonormal basis generalizes to the case of infinite-dimensional inner product spaces in the following way. Let $V$ be any inner product space. Then a collection $E = \left\{ e_a \right\}_{a \in A}$ is a for $V$ if the subspace of $V$ generated by finite linear combinations of elements of $E$ is dense in $V$ (in the norm induced by the inner product). Say that $E$ is an for $V$ if it is a basis and $\left\langle e_{a}, e_{b} \right\rangle = 0$ if $a \neq b$ and $\langle e_a, e_a \rangle = \$

^2 = 1 for all

a, b \in A.

Using an infinite-dimensional analog of the Gram-Schmidt process one may show:

Theorem. Any Separable space inner product space has an orthonormal basis.

Using the Hausdorff maximal principle and the fact that in a Hilbert space orthogonal projection onto linear subspaces is well-defined, one may also show that

Theorem. Any Hilbert space has an orthonormal basis.

The two previous theorems raise the question of whether all inner product spaces have an orthonormal basis. The answer, it turns out is negative. This is a non-trivial result, and is proved below. The following proof is taken from Halmos's A Hilbert Space Problem Book (see the references).

{

class="toccolours collapsible collapsed" width="90%" style="text-align:left" !Proof

Recall that the dimension of an inner product space is the cardinality of a maximal orthonormal system that it contains (by Zorn's lemma it contains at least one, and any two have the same cardinality). An orthonormal basis is certainly a maximal orthonormal system but the converse need not hold in general. If

G

is a dense subspace of an inner product space

V,

then any orthonormal basis for

G

is automatically an orthonormal basis for

V.

Thus, it suffices to construct an inner product space

V

with a dense subspace

G

whose dimension is strictly smaller than that of

V.

Let $K$ be a Hilbert space of dimension Aleph-null (for instance, $K = \ell^2(\N)$ ). Let $E$ be an orthonormal basis of $K,$ so

= c.

Let $L$ be a Hilbert space of dimension $c$ (for instance, $L = \ell^2(\R)$ ). Let $B$ be an orthonormal basis for $L$ and let $\varphi : F \to B$ be a bijection. Then there is a linear transformation $T : K \to L$ such that $T f = \varphi(f)$ for $f \in F,$ and $Te = 0$ for $e \in E.$

Let $V = K \oplus L$ and let $G = \{ (k, T k) : k \in K \}$ be the graph of $T.$ Let $\overline{G}$ be the closure of $G$ in $V$ ; we will show $\overline{G} = V.$ Since for any $e \in E$ we have $(e, 0) \in G,$ it follows that $K \oplus 0 \subseteq \overline{G}.$

Next, if $b \in B,$ then $b = T f$ for some $f \in F \subseteq K,$ so $(f, b) \in G \subseteq \overline{G}$ ; since $(f, 0) \in \overline{G}$ as well, we also have $(0, b) \in \overline{G}.$ It follows that $0 \oplus L \subseteq \overline{G},$ so $\overline{G} = V,$ and $G$ is dense in $V.$

Finally, $\{(e, 0) : e \in E \}$ is a maximal orthonormal set in $G$ ; if $0 = \langle (e, 0), (k, Tk) \rangle = \langle e, k \rangle + \langle 0, Tk \rangle = \langle e, k \rangle$ for all $e \in E$ then $k = 0,$ so $(k, Tk) = (0, 0)$ is the zero vector in $G.$ Hence the dimension of $G$ is

= \aleph_0, whereas it is clear that the dimension of

V

c.

This completes the proof.

Parseval's identity leads immediately to the following theorem:

Theorem. Let $V$ be a separable inner product space and $\left\{e_k\right\}_k$ an orthonormal basis of $V.$ Then the map $x \mapsto \bigl\{\langle e_k, x \rangle\bigr\}_{k \in \N}$ is an isometric linear map $V \rightarrow \ell^2$ with a dense image.

This theorem can be regarded as an abstract form of Fourier series, in which an arbitrary orthonormal basis plays the role of the sequence of trigonometric polynomials. Note that the underlying index set can be taken to be any countable set (and in fact any set whatsoever, provided $\ell^2$ is defined appropriately, as is explained in the article Hilbert space). In particular, we obtain the following result in the theory of Fourier series:

Theorem. Let $V$ be the inner product space $C-\pi,.$ Then the sequence (indexed on set of all integers) of continuous functions $e_k(t) = \frac{e^{i k t}}{\sqrt{2 \pi}}$ is an orthonormal basis of the space $C-\pi,$ with the $L^2$ inner product. The mapping $f \mapsto \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \left\{\int_{-\pi}^\pi f(t) e^{-i k t} \, \mathrm{d}t \right\}_{k \in \Z}$ is an isometric linear map with dense image.

Orthogonality of the sequence $\{ e_k \}_k$ follows immediately from the fact that if $k \neq j,$ then $\int_{-\pi}^\pi e^{-i (j - k) t} \, \mathrm{d}t = 0.$

Normality of the sequence is by design, that is, the coefficients are so chosen so that the norm comes out to 1. Finally the fact that the sequence has a dense algebraic span, in the , follows from the fact that the sequence has a dense algebraic span, this time in the space of continuous periodic functions on $-\pi,$ with the uniform norm. This is the content of the Weierstrass theorem on the uniform density of trigonometric polynomials.

Operators on inner product spaces

Several types of linear maps

A : V \to W

between inner product spaces

V

and

W

are of relevance:

: $A : V \to W$ is linear and continuous with respect to the metric defined above, or equivalently, $A$ is linear and the set of non-negative reals $\{ \|Ax\| : \|x\| \leq 1\},$ where $x$ ranges over the closed unit ball of $V,$ is bounded.
: $A : V \to W$ is linear and $\langle Ax, y \rangle = \langle x, Ay \rangle$ for all $x, y \in V.$
: $A : V \to W$ satisfies $\|A x\| = \|x\|$ for all $x \in V.$ A (resp. an ) is an isometry that is also a linear map (resp. an antilinear map). For inner product spaces, the polarization identity can be used to show that $A$ is an isometry if and only if $\langle Ax, Ay \rangle = \langle x, y \rangle$ for all $x, y \in V.$ All isometries are injective. The Mazur–Ulam theorem establishes that every surjective isometry between two normed spaces is an affine transformation. Consequently, an isometry $A$ between real inner product spaces is a linear map if and only if $A(0) = 0.$ Isometries are between inner product spaces, and morphisms of real inner product spaces are orthogonal transformations (compare with orthogonal matrix).
: $A : V \to W$ is an isometry which is surjective (and hence bijective). Isometrical isomorphisms are also known as unitary operators (compare with unitary matrix).

From the point of view of inner product space theory, there is no need to distinguish between two spaces which are isometrically isomorphic. The spectral theorem provides a canonical form for symmetric, unitary and more generally on finite dimensional inner product spaces. A generalization of the spectral theorem holds for continuous normal operators in Hilbert spaces.

Generalizations

Any of the axioms of an inner product may be weakened, yielding generalized notions. The generalizations that are closest to inner products occur where bilinearity and conjugate symmetry are retained, but positive-definiteness is weakened.

Degenerate inner products

V

is a vector space and

\langle \,\cdot\,, \,\cdot\, \rangle

a semi-definite sesquilinear form, then the function:

\|x\| = \sqrt{\langle x, x\rangle}

makes sense and satisfies all the properties of norm except that

\|x\| = 0

does not imply

x = 0

(such a functional is then called a semi-norm). We can produce an inner product space by considering the quotient

W = V / \{x : \|x\| = 0\}.

The sesquilinear form

\langle \,\cdot\,, \,\cdot\, \rangle

factors through

W.

This construction is used in numerous contexts. The Gelfand–Naimark–Segal construction is a particularly important example of the use of this technique. Another example is the representation of semi-definite kernels on arbitrary sets.

Nondegenerate conjugate symmetric forms

Alternatively, one may require that the pairing be a nondegenerate form, meaning that for all non-zero

x \neq 0

there exists some

y

such that

\langle x, y \rangle \neq 0,

though

y

need not equal

x

; in other words, the induced map to the dual space

V \to V^*

is injective. This generalization is important in differential geometry: a manifold whose tangent spaces have an inner product is a Riemannian manifold, while if this is related to nondegenerate conjugate symmetric form the manifold is a pseudo-Riemannian manifold. By Sylvester's law of inertia, just as every inner product is similar to the dot product with positive weights on a set of vectors, every nondegenerate conjugate symmetric form is similar to the dot product with weights on a set of vectors, and the number of positive and negative weights are called respectively the positive index and negative index. Product of vectors in Minkowski space is an example of indefinite inner product, although, technically speaking, it is not an inner product according to the standard definition above. Minkowski space has four dimensions and indices 3 and 1 (assignment of "+" and "−" to them differs depending on conventions).

Purely algebraic statements (ones that do not use positivity) usually only rely on the nondegeneracy (the injective homomorphism $V \to V^*$ ) and thus hold more generally.

Inner product space

( Normed Spaces )

Account

Navigation

Statistics

Inner product space ( Normed Spaces )

Account

Navigation

Statistics

Inner product space

( Normed Spaces )